|
Re: Monkey Revival
07/25/17 11:31 PM
|
|
|
> > > That’s great news about "Typing Monkeys" project comes back, and thanks to all > > people > > > involved on that project for their time and work. > > > I know that can be off topic, but I’ve read on Guru’s site that Operation Wolf > > C-chip > > > was decapped and the rom had been extracted by Capsoff. Is it true? There isn't > any > > > post about it on Caps0ff blog > > > > It's true. > > > > Haze added support for the dumps in > > https://github.com/mamedev/mame/commit/0019c8cbd019f706456f95b82fbcf7ffee641187 > > > > However, as he says, it's currently bad. > > > https://github.com/mamedev/mame/commit/d...10c2da50363a441 > > > > This could be why they didn't post news about it. > > > > - Stiletto > > To clarify > > The C-Chip has 2 ROM parts, a MASK rom inside the UPD78C11 which is assumed to be the > same for all games and an EPROM which definitely differs between games. > > The MASK rom was imaged and typed up, it's rather interesting. The internal checksum > on that passes, so chances are it's a good dump. > > EPROMs can't be dumped using this technique as there's nothing to see, so an attempt > was made to dump the EPROM by wiring it up directly to the decapped die but the > Cap0ff guys couldn't get one of the address lines to work properly, so half the data > is missing. It was very delicate work, tiniest of slips and you have to start over. > The dumped data is interesting as you can see some of the tables the current > operation wolf simulation uses in it, but as the dump isn't complete it wasn't > possible to switch the emulation over to using it. > > The MASK rom actually contains what looks like functions that could be exploited to > read out the EPROM, so attempts have been made to use them, however it seems Taito > anticipated this and the one of the port writes done in the code is blocking any > further commands or responses externally. Annoying, otherwise you would have had some > rather juicy news already.
Annoying, but not insurmountable, right? Is there a way around that?
"Note to Noobs:
We are glad to help you but simply posting that something does not work is not going to lead to you getting help. The more information you can supply defining your problem, the less likely it will be that you will get smart-alec replies.
C.D.~"
|
|