> I really wanted to help you, but you know what, help yourself. IDC. > > I read all the posts here, but you seem to not read the answers. As i said, most of > the problems, could be everything, if you refuse to help us, why i should invest time > to help you. > > All i can say is, that Stella is miles behind from MAME in terms of visual and > emulation perspective and i needed about 5min. to solve the gui to start most of the > machines including games. > > "However, from a user perspective - which Mame devs may not care about - they've a > long way to go. " > dont think so.. its very nice how it is, could be better, but not to that degree like > you describe it here. > > "It offers a little less than Stella, with an interface that is much worse." > > Wrong in all terms.
Yes, absolutely - don't help me out. I'm more than happy with that. Your help seems to come with a chip on your shoulder and a dose of sarcasm. Not really help, is it? So yeah, just avoid my posts in future (there's an IGNORE function on the board you might want to use). if you can't have an adult discussion without resorting to this nonsense, it's not like either one of us will miss the other, or that your replies are of much interest.
As for the rest of your post - you do like to suggest that your experience, and opinion, is the last word on everything, don't you? My opinion is that when you stray from Arcade titles, Mame starts to get a bit.... knotty. You have a different opinion. It's okay. There's no need to right-fight. Neither of us are "right", we just feel differently about this issue.
I also don't think you've never used Stella - because for 2600 stuff it's far better than what I've thus seen from Mame, even when I can get a game running. But it's all good, we're free to use what suits us. Perhaps you need help in setting Stella up? If so, don't call me.
|