MAMEWorld Forums - The Loony Bin

Maan, been away two weeks. Time has roolled byy. Anyways.....

> > Also, the chick in that picture has the kind of flabby thighs that would make Traso drool.

> Let's be real - she's WAY too thin for Traso's taste.

Goddamn, I'm notorious. But misconstrued. That girl has loads of 'strong' features. In general, her body is a curvy athletic build. She has 'straight' knees, meaning her interior leg muscle is not emphasized and appearing to push her knee cap aside. Her calves are almost a continuous curve from under-knee to bottom of ankle. In essence, her legs follow a straight line, yet trace it in arc.

Foot-wise: good instep, which continues 'un-boned' down to the knuckle bed, good arches, and her heel is bell-shaped and roundish underneath (rather than peasant-looking and straight, or conversely bobbly). Also notice the contour from heel to mid-foot, where it flares in a certain female-ish fashion*, and the light line of separation from there forward. Her secondary toes are short, though.

Her muscle tone did catch my attention, in that I knew someone would not like them. She's a 70s/80s hard body, but hard body these days means she has to look a little bit like a man in musculature.

She's cute enough, though her nose slants down a little, and she may have a typical east coast overbite.

I think she's attractive and is good stock. I could do more with her**, but I wouldn't put her off.

*Female feet often flare out in the outside, the range where this begins being all the way back as in the example here, or very far foward. Markedly different from guy feet, though, which tend to be wide in a certain way.

**Look up chicks like Flower Tucci, who were slender-ish pears and such in the early years, but then for some reason decided to put on a bunch of muscle, and some cushion, to show how bountiful their bodies could be.

Scifi frauds. SF illuminates.
_________________

Culture General Contact Unit (Eccentric)