> > Is there something that makes DosBox deficient in your view to make that kind of
> > statement?
>
> Some of its features are rather flaky, e.g. MIDI I/O and some of the sound card
> emulation. Network emulation isn't very good, either. It's at the point where it's
> good enough for most games people want to play, and it just hasn't progressed.
All true. But it plays a lot of games, can output to MUNT for mt-32 emulation and supports CRT pixel shaders if you use unofficial builds like the ones here:
http://ykhwong.x-y.net/
So I still use it for playing my old Sierra adventure games. 
MESS MAME can do a lot of this too and as time goes on will only do more. So that's what I will probably replace dosbox with. Eventually.
|
Previous 
Index 
Next 
Flat 
Re: Better than DosBox?
Reply
