> I was browsing MESS machines and found several clones for Commodore 128 (NTSC) (name > c128 driver c128.c). > Shouldn't Commodore 128 (PAL) (name c128p driver c128.c) be a clone of c128 ?
Only the driver author can answer that. It has been that way for over 2.5 years and does allow for each set to have a 'romset.zip'. If it were a clone of c128, c128p would not show up on the internal UI because there would be no c128p romset (in split merge mode, a .zip for each set and it's unique roms), since all the parts of the c128/c128p are the same and therefore making the cloneset redundant.
Should it be changed? I dunno. Refer to my first statement
|