> I personally don't truly consider something emulated until it's in MAME/MESS. The > problem with a lot of the one off emulators is that they just have shitty video > output. > > Take Demul, for example. Yeah, maybe it emulates Naomi games better than MAME does, > but it has microstuttering and runs like ass even if you're getting 100% speed. > > MAME has no microstuttering. It runs very well.
You wouldn't see microstuttering even if there was any given that naomi never reaches 100% in mame. And demul currently has much better rendering quality than mame.
> MAME's the only emulator that really feels bulletproof when you actually play games > on it. It's kind of ironic given MAME's goal of being a documentation project; it > plays games better than any other emulator I can think of.
It's not ironic. We really try to find out how things are really working inside. Not all emulator authors do (or did, emulators-only-for-playing as quite passe by now).