> Also, the 32X could've done games with more frames of animation, but cartridge ROM
> was still very, very expensive at that time.
The Amiga 500 was good for its time, it probably could of done a arcade perfect port of Double Dragon, judging from some of its games from the early 90's. I think the Sega Saturn was pretty well behind the coin op, even its final games didn't look close to Model 2 games, the PSX wouldn't of been as far behind, the original Ridge Racer was close to the System 22 version, the PSX version had better color i think even though they both have same color capabilities, it just lacked the raw power, it ran at 30fps as opposed to 60fps, PSX only had 1mb of video memory but in most other ways it was as powerful as the Namco 22 and Sega Model boards in 1995, the PSX arcade hardware made Tekken 3 look decent, it looked pretty ugly on the PSX, it is amazing what another 1mb of video memory can do.
I am the original retro game dork.
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: Why don't they produce arcade hardware that is ahead of the PC anymore!
Reply
