|
Tomu Breidah |
|
No Problems, Only Solutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 08/14/04
|
|
Posts: 6830
|
|
Loc: Neither here, nor there.
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
Re: Mechanical aptitude experiment.
05/09/14 04:44 PM
|
|
|
> You have two systems, "A" and "B". A drive pulley at "1", and a follower pulley at
> "10". Your size ratio will follow the naming convention at 1:10 in both systems.
> System "B" is identical to system "A" in all dimensions, with the exception that an
> idler pulley was added at "2" and the belt routed around it.
>
> Please identify the effect the introduction of "2" has on the system, specifically
> the effect on "10". You don't have to be specific.
Based on the position of "2" would the belt.... or all the pulleys be moving counter clock-wise?
Or would that even matter? Just thinking about the location of "2" and how the belt might act during high speeds. 
/layman guessing
LEVEL-4
|
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: Mechanical aptitude experiment.
Reply
Mechanical aptitude experiment.
