> > I don't like tiles either. I hate how they made Windows 8 look like a smart > > phone/tablet. It's like they dumb downed the OS, oversimplifying it to accommodate > > morons who don't know how to work a computer. I dread having to get Win 8.1, but I > > feel like I have no other choice because I don't want to get an older > > version/technology, Win 7, even though I like Win 7. > > > > Does Microsoft plan on sticking with the tile look of Win 8 when they release the > > next version of windows, Win 9 or whatever it will be called? Idk why there hasn't > > been such an outcry, more than there already is, that basically forces Microsoft to > > go back to the Win 7/XP style. > > > > You guys mentioned about having to use virtual machines. Idk why Microsoft couldn't > > have all that built into the OS where the user can use any XP and up program. Well, > > that feature rarely worked in XP either, the "Run this program in compatibility > mode > > = Windows 95". Anytime I ever tried using that it never worked. > > I've tried about 50 times and it worked about 3 times, but that's just because the > program stopped saying Windows 7 wasn't supported. > > I find it pointless to use windows 8 on any machine that doesn't have a touch screen > but even then, the annoying quirks are still there. I find it ridiculous that > Microsoft didn't add in a big IF. > if(system.input != touchscreen){ > EnableTiles(0); > }else{ > EnableTiles(1); > }
This is Microsoft we're talking about, Naoki. Anything that would actually be good for the end users is something they will never implement.
"Note to Noobs:
We are glad to help you but simply posting that something does not work is not going to lead to you getting help. The more information you can supply defining your problem, the less likely it will be that you will get smart-alec replies.
Index 
Flat 
Re: Retro emulators that aren't compatible with Win 8
Reply
