> > > Yeah I'd want to know exactly what svn revision they were using and compare it to
> > > that for a start. We've had plenty of changes recently that could slow things
> down,
> > > it might be that retroarch hasn't updated to that yet.
> >
> > Except that his point of consternation is that MAME is *faster* than Retroarch for
> > ST-V games.
>
> I think he was also asking why some arcade games emulated with Retroarch + filters
> were faster than MAME + HLSL.
> As said elsewhere, anyway, Retroarch forks use several different MAME cores, going
> from v0.36b, to v0.78, v0.139 and v0.150, so the difference in speed might very well
> be due to some games being emulated with 0.36 or 0.78 (which in some cases would
> leave more PC resources free for filters)
So the core is automatically chosen by Retroarch depending on the game?
I guess that's it.
thx
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: Retroarch and mame speed difference
Reply
