> > An emulator (MAME or any other) will have at least 1 video frame of latency, and at
> > least 2 if you enable triple buffering.
>
> How about v-sync (waitvsync 1)? Curious. From what I read/recall it is better to
> v-sync than triple buffer if you're system/video can handle it.
My original statement that you quoted is authoritative on this matter; vsync gives you at least 1 frame of latency, triple gives you at least 2. No sync at all may get you less than a frame of delay, but of course everything tears then.
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: MAME latencies?
Reply
