> Seriously? A 0.36 port? At the end of 2013? That's over a decade old! It's not a good > idea to encourage this stuff.
I came to ask this... What is special about .36 that many of these ports seem to get derived from? Was the CPU usage really that much better? It seems rather odd to ignore nearly 14 years of progress. That bad boy was released in March of 2000. Also the newer version has been ported to what at least 4-5 different CPU/OS architectures at this point? Why would you ignore that?
Index 
Flat 
Re: ArcadeFlex 0.36.1
Reply
