|
Re: Oh, no you didn't...
12/19/13 04:46 AM
|
|
|
> In regard to your response though I have noticed that pattern with some artists, like > in music a band's first album will be amazing and then everything afterward is > downhill. I think it has to do with the time they spend on the first project, > churning it over and over perfecting it for years until they get their first break at > which case they release a cream of the crop condensed kickassness, then everything > after that is just sort of "whatever comes out next we'll put on an album". Stone > Roses come to mind.
Not always true. Sometimes it's the second album that's the best. Usually, the first album is rough, but if it was even mildly successful, then the band has more money for proper studio time and maybe a producer that can put some polish on the album. Check out this list for some good ones...
http://www.ranker.com/crowdranked-list/the-best-sophomore-albums-of-all-time
GroovyMAME support forum on BYOAC
|
|