> Requiring the agreement in order to use custom (a.k.a. decent) thumbnails is > retarded. People making a living off their videos have got to be like 1 in a billion > according to what I've heard the pay is. For the average user, even with hundreds of > subscribers, you'd earn about a 6 pack of beer per year for having your videos be > annoying as a motherfucker. For anyone actually earning a living off them, I'm really > curious how many millions of views they get per month.
You should be able to choose from any frame in the video- it is not really a "custom" thumbnail as long as it exists in the video. Frazz was shown for maybe two seconds while the main topic, Watterson's strip, had plenty of screen time.
Dunno if Youtube has an algorithm for least representative thumbnail, but this site apparently does. Yep, I am leaping to this conclusion based on one video.
|