MAMEWorld >> News
Previous thread Previous  View all threads Index   Next thread Next   Flat Mode Flat  

TafoidAdministrator
I keep on testing.. testing.. testing... into the future!
Reged: 04/19/06
Posts: 3137
Loc: USA
Send PM
Re: MAME 0.149
06/12/13 08:38 PM


> Also broken here (Slackware Linux 13.37):
>
> bash-4.1# make -j9 all
> Compiling src/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.c...
> cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
> In file included from src/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.c0:
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc: In member function 'void
> hd6309_device::execute_one()':
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc7: error: case label value exceeds maximum value for
> type
> In file included from src/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.c0:
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc16: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc16: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc78: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc16: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc16: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc78: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc16: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc16: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc78: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc57: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc79: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc79: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc79: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc79: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.inc78: error: large integer implicitly truncated to
> unsigned type
> make: *** [obj/sdl/emu/cpu/m6809/hd6309.o] Error 1

I'm told that if you apply Arbee's "line ending" patch HERE, this should not happen.







Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* MAME 0.149 abelenki 06/11/13 12:06 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Cyberzinho Punk  06/13/13 06:28 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Cyberzinho Punk  06/12/13 04:06 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 TafoidAdministrator  06/12/13 08:38 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 flamuss  06/13/13 03:23 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 R. Belmont  06/13/13 05:00 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Janez  06/13/13 05:23 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 R. Belmont  06/13/13 08:10 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 flamuss  06/13/13 08:38 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 R. Belmont  06/13/13 09:02 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 flamuss  06/14/13 08:50 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Anonymous  06/14/13 04:10 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 R. Belmont  06/14/13 03:42 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 H@P  06/25/13 07:26 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Vas Crabb  06/14/13 12:05 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Rockman  06/11/13 11:13 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 B2K24  06/11/13 06:35 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 (correct 32-bit binary) TafoidAdministrator  06/11/13 03:59 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 (correct 32-bit binary) joey35car  06/11/13 05:49 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 (correct 32-bit binary) TafoidAdministrator  06/11/13 06:14 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 (correct 32-bit binary) joey35car  06/11/13 06:39 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 (correct 32-bit binary) Traso  06/12/13 08:12 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 (correct 32-bit binary) CiroConsentino  06/12/13 10:21 AM
. * build non 64bits = Crash (same as mess) xibic  06/11/13 01:58 PM
. * Re: build non 64bits = Crash (same as mess) RobbbertModerator  06/11/13 03:44 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Ramirez  06/11/13 01:12 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Spyder  06/11/13 01:02 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.149 Spyder  06/12/13 11:33 AM

Extra information Permissions
Moderator:  John IV, Robbbert, Tafoid 
0 registered and 132 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
Thread views: 5044