> > I've researched this some.. it seems to be a valid performance hit and it seems to > > boil down to some rewrites that happened just after 0.148u2 was released. I don't > > think simple reverting of code is the answer, however. > > Which rewrites? Because a perf loss of that magnitude is definitely a thing.
I was r21002 as a strong possibility.. replaced a section of code from before/after and noticed most of my speed returned (regarding "get_window_pixel" routine).