Dullaron |
Diablo III - Dunard #1884
|
|
|
Reged: 07/22/05
|
Posts: 6125
|
Loc: Fort Worth, Tx
|
|
Send PM
|
|
Re: George Lucas confirms Ford, Fisher and Hamill for new 'Star Wars'
03/12/13 01:44 PM
|
|
|
> > > I think part of the reason the original trilogy was so perfect is the actors were > > > able to nail the takes quickly and in the recent trilogy Lucas used inferior > actors > > > and was too lazy to command tons of retakes. Some of the acting like Anakin in > > > Episode 1 was beyond terrible to the point of facepalming. So on the one hand it > > will > > > be nice to have actors who can nail scenes without needing to be whipped but on > the > > > other hand what can you do with grandparents besides a cameo. > > > > I didn't think the new ones aren't that great because of the young actors. But oh > > well. I'm glad the older actors are coming back. > > I have to disagree. Natalie Portman and Ewan McGregor can act. I think Liam Neeson > must have gambling debts with some of the movies he's done lately, but he's certainly > a serious actor. Even Hayden Christensen has done better than in the prequels. > > I think the biggest problem was too much CGI and virtual sets. You see it in every > movie that's tried it. Actors need to be in the proper environment, with sets and > costumes and props, to turn in a good performance. Standing in a green box, staring > at a dot on a stick just doesn't cut it. > > The other problem is that George Lucas is kind of a crap writer. Back when he was > still a nobody, the actors and people around him would call him on it, and tweak the > dialog to make it work. By the time of the prequels, he was George fucking Lucas, so > nobody dared challenge him and just vomited out his wooden, awkward dialog.
I'm pointing at Even Hayden Christensen and the little boy. Just doesn't feel right have them acting in Star Wars.
W11 Home 64-bit + Nobara OS / AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT / AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core 3.59 GHz / RAM 64 GB
|
|