Subject
|
Posted by
|
Posted on
|
WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
Smitdogg
|
02/16/13 05:56 AM
|
As much as you want to like it, the whole thing goes on WAY too long, every episode, all the way through.
|
TriggerFin
|
02/16/13 04:35 PM
|
Re: As much as you want to like it, the whole thing goes on WAY too long, every episode, all the way through.
|
italie
|
02/16/13 05:00 PM
|
Re: As much as you want to like it, the whole thing goes on WAY too long, every episode, all the way through.
|
Smitdogg
|
02/16/13 04:45 PM
|
An hour a week, or less. (nt)
|
TriggerFin
|
02/16/13 11:53 PM
|
Re: As much as you want to like it, the whole thing goes on WAY too long, every episode, all the way through.
|
igamabob
|
02/16/13 06:23 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
yaggy
|
02/16/13 04:11 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
Smitdogg
|
02/16/13 04:16 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
italie
|
02/16/13 05:15 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
DMala
|
02/16/13 06:14 AM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
Smitdogg
|
02/16/13 06:22 AM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
italie
|
02/16/13 07:49 AM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
Smitdogg
|
02/16/13 03:31 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
italie
|
02/16/13 03:52 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
Smitdogg
|
02/16/13 03:54 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
italie
|
02/16/13 03:59 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
Smitdogg
|
02/16/13 04:11 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
italie
|
02/16/13 04:59 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
Smitdogg
|
02/16/13 05:01 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
italie
|
02/16/13 05:16 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
Smitdogg
|
02/16/13 05:18 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
krick
|
02/16/13 06:45 PM
|
NT course
|
Smitdogg
|
02/16/13 06:47 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
italie
|
02/16/13 05:27 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
DMala
|
02/17/13 07:38 AM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
Smitdogg
|
02/18/13 03:31 PM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
*=/STARRIDER\=*
|
02/16/13 06:01 AM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
Smitdogg
|
02/16/13 06:20 AM
|
Re: WTFAAACK could Battlestar Galactica be any more slower and dragged out?
|
italie
|
02/16/13 06:18 AM
|
I don't know what that means! nt
|
*=/STARRIDER\=*
|
02/16/13 07:07 AM
|