> I could scrutinize the rest of your post, but this piece of non punctuated garbage is > enough to show the piece of shit you are: > > > I wonder if those who make this comparison between Europeans taking over land > > populated largely by nomads and Mexicans illegally entering owned land that is part > > of a country with established laws regarding such actions ever bother to think > beyond > > "they immigrated too." > > Yes, there is no comparison between the extermination of an entire population and > culture, with foreign illegally crossing a country's boarder.
"Border."
Eight million people is an invasion. The twelve million before that that we decided to ignore were, too, until we told them they could stay.
> What's revolting, is > your judgement of values. You reduced the importance of native Americans > extermination, to present it as a less important fact than Mexicans crossing U.S. > boarders. > Here you're showing your despise and contempt for Mexicans and Native Americans.
There you go again. I never said anything bad about the second group that I didn't say about everyone in the whole world, ever, and I said, what, exactly, about the first group? Oh, right. Nothing. If you think all Mexicans are illegal immigrants, that's you, not me. I said I, and most people, have no problem at all with anyone who chooses to come here legally.
> > Guess what, imbecile? You're wrong on all counts. > > > > The only group of people I've any disdain toward is those who do just what you've > > done here; you can't answer a simple question when asked to defend your charge, and > > lead off every post with insults, followed by nothing but more insults, and I've > only > > directed anything negative at someone doing that. > > I didn't answer before, in the scrutinized way that you think you're entitled to, > simply because your assertions and justifications are so absurd, that it didn't > deserve to be answered. Why would I answer to a mentally weak person like you? I > don't know... but I just did it.
You lack the ability to reason and comprehend. I said things and you chose, and still choose, to claim I said something entirely different. If I think I'm "entitled" to something, it would be not being attacked for saying something I never said or meaning something I specifically excluded from what I said. That would be civil discourse in a public forum, rather than your hateful rhetoric.
Further unjustifiable hate from you deleted.
|