|
Re: ....
07/21/12 06:29 AM
|
|
|
> I was thinking the exact same thing, in an instance like this anyone in his near > proximity could probably have ended the carnage in a second if they were concealed > owners and had their gun. I did not know about the ban until I read your comment.
Bullshit. You seriously think you could get the guy in a crowded, darkened, smoke-filled cinema when he's wearing a bullet-proof vest? You'd need to place the guy, clear the line in front and behind him, and get a shot on a part of him that isn't armoured. You would've just increased the number of victims.
|
|