> "Was it something to do with this establishment, even, or did he choose it because he
> damn well knew the fucking mall banned firearms on the premises, making for easy
> targets?"
>
> I was thinking the exact same thing, in an instance like this anyone in his near
> proximity could probably have ended the carnage in a second if they were concealed
> owners and had their gun. I did not know about the ban until I read your comment.
I don't know that specifically about this place. It's a general rule that mall management across the country bans firearms. They do so to avoid cases where someone gets shot and they get sued for allowing them. I don't know if anyone has successfully sued for being shot when they weren't permitted to carry a licensed gun, though I recall there was at least one case.
Playing the odds. You've no standing to sue for the absence of legal firearms unless you've actually been denied entry due to carrying your own.
|
Previous 
Index 
Next 
Flat 
Re: ....
Reply
....
