|
Re: More time at MAME then MEME please. Thanks, Biatch.
07/07/12 10:11 PM
|
|
|
> > > > You don't seem to know the difference between "then" and "than" -and therefore, > > > what > > > > little credibility you had before has now been completely obliterated. Please > > flush > > > > your head in a toilet. > > > > > > > > fixed & fixed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Should there also be a comma before therefore? > > > > > > Eh, maybe. But I think that can depend on how one would say the sentence. With a > > comma one would have a slight pause. Maybe Triggerfin knows... Not that he must > > reply. > > > > > > fyi: When I put the comma after "Thanks" that was like he was signing off. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Tom > > There is very little that should bring you to place a comma after "and" in a normal > sentence. Given the words used, I'd just go with this: > > You don't seem to know the difference between "then" and "than," and therefore what > little credibility you had before has now been completely obliterated. > > Possibly break it up, restoring the comma's place: > > You seem not to know the difference between "then" and "than." Therefore, what > little credibility you had had has been obliterated. > > "Obliteration" is an absolute state. Any modifier should only weaken it. > > The obliteration of credibility, however, should be contingent on a serious failing > in the particular field of supposed knowledge, not a typographical error or simple > misused word. > > No, mister TV, that Mexican dog is not "possibly" descended from a fox it bears a > passing resemblance to, and the universe is neither one dimensional nor sentient. > > Now, World Wide Words has new content due today. Also, when merry Mary marries, all > three words need to sound different, or your accent is broken.
This thread makes me LOL!
|
|