|
redk9258 |
|
Regular
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
|
Posts: 3968
|
|
Loc: Troy, Illinois USA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
Re: CHDMAN
07/05/12 12:00 PM
|
|
|
> and Arbee's post on his blog is about the fact that (due to some uninitialized
> variables in the source) with 0.146 chdman slightly different compression could have
> been achieved even with the same settings on different OSes or in different runs on
> Windows.
> Now this is fixed, and everyone should get the same result if they use the same
> compression
That's why I posted the results of the area51.chd that I converted. I used 'chdman copy -i area51.old -o area51.chd'. I did not specify compression and let chdman take care of that. I would expect that everyone using chdman 0.146u2 would get the same checksum for area51.chd.
|
|
Previous 
Index 
Next 
Flat 
Re: CHDMAN
Reply
