> I'm sure you were waiting for someone with this type of reply, so here it is.
I'm also sure you were sinking for a reply like this so here I go wikipediafagocitationstyle:
>>The film garnered a 74% approval rating from 238 critics – an average rating of 6.9 out of 10 – on the review-aggregate website Rotten Tomatoes, whose consensus reads: "Ridley Scott's ambitious quasi-prequel to Alien may not answer all of its big questions, but it's redeemed by its haunting visual grandeur and compelling performances -- particularly Michael Fassbender as a fastidious android."[181] Metacritic provides a score of 65 out of 100 from 42 critics, indicating "generally favorable" reviews.[182] CinemaScore polls reported that the average grade moviegoers gave the film was a "B" on an A+ to F scale, with audience members under 25 rating it the highest at A-.[178][183] Reviews were frequently praising of both the film's visual aesthetic and design, and Fassbender's performance as the android David received almost universal acclaim. However the plot drew a more mixed response, with criticism of plot elements that remained unresolved or were predictable, tempered by appreciation for the action and horror set-pieces.
Additionally, it scores currently at 7.7 on IMDb (76k voters) which isn't bad either. So between that and your comments, I'm more inclined to think that you might like it more or less, but the movie is not *that* bad.
Wound up, can't sleep, can't do anything right, little honey / Oh, since I set my eyes on you. / I tell you the truth.
I can't get it right / Get it right / Since I met you...
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: Prometheus
Reply
