> I believe this was already busted as a line of reasoning. Only the parts of the > program in-use get loaded into memory.
Yes that's what I thought too. Then again I don't know much, so I still would like to have his real data analysis on this. (he wouldn't take the time to make the "logo" he created if he wasn't sure of his statement... ...would he?)
> Nevertheless, this is my last response on this line, lest this go down the EXACT same > road the last few discussions have.
Oh it will. We all know it. It's not even funny any more.