MAMEWorld >> EmuChat
Previous thread Previous  View all threads Index   Next thread Next   Flat Mode Flat  

Vas Crabb
BOFH
Reged: 12/13/05
Posts: 4462
Loc: Melbourne, Australia
Send PM
Re: I think this was the necessary part of your post....
10/04/11 02:45 AM


> > So I should only post things that you think are necessary? OK I'll PM you next time I
> > want to post and you can edit for me. Thanks.
>
> No, he means that your criticism of the C++ conversion of the input system validates
> his claim that MAMEdev suck and we should rewrite the project in x86 assembly.

You're getting your trolls confused. Bizimonki is the one who hates C++ while Mogli is just a dick in general who thinks he's God's gift.







Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Dev question: is ioport_group redundant? Bryan Ischo 09/30/11 11:53 PM
. * I think this was the necessary part of your post.... mogli  10/03/11 01:41 AM
. * Re: I think this was the necessary part of your post.... Bryan Ischo  10/03/11 06:06 PM
. * Re: I think this was the necessary part of your post.... R. Belmont  10/03/11 06:33 PM
. * Re: I think this was the necessary part of your post.... Bryan Ischo  10/04/11 03:05 AM
. * Re: I think this was the necessary part of your post.... R. Belmont  10/04/11 04:28 PM
. * Re: I think this was the necessary part of your post.... Bryan Ischo  10/04/11 06:38 PM
. * Re: I think this was the necessary part of your post.... Vas Crabb  10/04/11 02:45 AM
. * Re: I think this was the necessary part of your post.... mogli  10/05/11 12:26 AM
. * Re: Dev question: is ioport_group redundant? etabeta  10/01/11 12:36 PM
. * Re: Dev question: is ioport_group redundant? R. Belmont  10/03/11 04:10 PM

Extra information Permissions
Moderator:  Robbbert, Tafoid 
1 registered and 325 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
Thread views: 1195