MAMEWorld >> The Loony Bin
View all threads Index   Flat Mode Flat  

Tomu Breidah
No Problems, Only Solutions
Reged: 08/14/04
Posts: 6819
Loc: Neither here, nor there.
Send PM
Re: perfect example [nt]
09/17/11 10:54 PM


> At any rate, engineers and architects supporting some grand conspiracy theory is
> embarrassing. All the buildings were connected by tunnels. All the buildings also had
> elevator shafts. Windows were obviously damaged as well. Start some fires in building
> 7. Now funnel thousands of cubic feet of air into these tunnels from each tower
> collapsing. What are you left with in building 7? A fucking blast furnace, forge,
> large kiln...etc. There is your extreme heat source and subsequent integrity
> compromise. The rest is simple physics.

So the fires in Building 7 started before the buildings collapsed? Do we really know if it happened because of the planes crashing and debris flying into WTC7? This would have to have been from WTC2 being hit from the south side and flaming debris flying over to that distance northward. Or was it due to the collapse and burning(?) debris making it's way to those offices? Wasn't the fire from the collapse said to have been on the ground floor? But there is video of fires up on a couple higher floors. That alone shouldn't be enough to bring a building down, and certainly no way for traveling air (or hot air) to fuel them from tunnels below.

Blast furnace? How do you figure? Would there not have been debris to fill these tunnels? I mean, the buildings were completely destroyed up top... Why not underneath as well? (that's disregarding the witness accounts of explosions that were heard coming from underneath/underground before the collapse so we'd presume 110 stories being reduced to a 4 story high pile also didn't -maybe- fill up any space below that?). Could air have been flowing at a high enough rate to fuel it for a little less than 6 hours? Constantly? (I know I'm probably putting words in your mouth - just asking to see if you've thought it through). And would enough damage to the ALL supporting columns happen all at the same time so that the building falls symmetrically just as they do in almost all controlled high-rise demolitions?


LEVEL-4


Edited by T0M (09/17/11 10:59 PM)







Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* I don't think I'll be watching that. (nt) TriggerFin 09/14/11 03:49 AM
. * You know, when I posted this... TriggerFin  09/18/11 08:48 PM
. * I wouldn't watch ANYTHING on CW [nt] Tomu Breidah  09/19/11 07:42 AM
. * his wife is the terrorist! -nt- Vas Crabb  09/19/11 02:13 PM
. * Dil is a guy. -nt- igamabob  09/19/11 02:41 PM
. * Did you see the video twisty posted? [nt] Tomu Breidah  09/16/11 09:17 AM
. * Why? 1000 architects are no more convincing than 1000 climatologists. [nt] TriggerFin  09/16/11 02:51 PM
. * Then if you can't take it seriously then watch it for the laughs . :-) Tomu Breidah  09/16/11 05:46 PM
. * Re: Then if you can't take it seriously then watch it for the laughs . :-) lharms  09/16/11 05:54 PM
. * perfect example [nt] Tomu Breidah  09/16/11 06:43 PM
. * Re: perfect example [nt] URherenow  09/17/11 10:53 AM
. * Re: perfect example [nt] Tomu Breidah  09/17/11 05:09 PM
. * Re: perfect example [nt] Vas Crabb  09/17/11 05:50 PM
. * Re: perfect example [nt] italieAdministrator  09/17/11 09:24 PM
. * Re: perfect example [nt] lharms  09/18/11 03:31 AM
. * This is called the denial stage, that's natural :-) Tomu Breidah  09/18/11 04:17 PM
. * Re: This is called the denial stage, that's natural :-) italieAdministrator  09/18/11 07:10 PM
. * Re: perfect example [nt] italieAdministrator  09/18/11 07:19 AM
. * Re: perfect example [nt] Tomu Breidah  09/17/11 10:54 PM
. * Re: perfect example [nt] italieAdministrator  09/17/11 11:57 PM
. * Re: perfect example [nt] URherenow  09/17/11 08:23 PM
. * Re: perfect example [nt] TriggerFin  09/17/11 08:25 PM
. * Re: perfect example [nt] italieAdministrator  09/17/11 11:42 PM

Extra information Permissions
Moderator:  GatKong 
0 registered and 129 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
Thread views: 2655