italie |
|
MAME owes italie many thank yous, hah
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/20/03
|
|
Posts: 15246
|
|
Loc: BoomTown
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
Re: perfect example [nt]
09/17/11 09:24 PM
|
|
|
> > I guess it's good to want to defend this country, and it's okay to provide
> > alternative theories (some are good, some aren't), but there's just way too much on
> > the 'WTF' side of the scale to cast a huge doubt on the "official story". I guess
> > that's why I lean towards the 'Truthers' side.
> >
> > Sorry to anyone that doesn't feel that way.
>
> Well, just to put it out there, I hadn't really looked into the whole "truther" thing
> much, assuming it was all just fringe conspiracy theories. It wasn't until some post
> (last year IIRC) when URHereNow said something about googling pictures of the
> Pentagon impact. I did out of idle curiosity, and it really didn't add up with the
> official story. Since then I've done some more research, and plenty of other parts of
> the official story don't make sense in my mind, either. I could say that URHN and you
> have turned have turned me into a bit of a "truther" as well.
I'm having a hard time sorting out who is arguing for what here...
At any rate, engineers and architects supporting some grand conspiracy theory is embarrassing. All the buildings were connected by tunnels. All the buildings also had elevator shafts. Windows were obviously damaged as well. Start some fires in building 7. Now funnel thousands of cubic feet of air into these tunnels from each tower collapsing. What are you left with in building 7? A fucking blast furnace, forge, large kiln...etc. There is your extreme heat source and subsequent integrity compromise. The rest is simple physics.
|
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: perfect example [nt]
Reply
