|
Re: perfect example [nt]
09/17/11 05:50 PM
|
|
|
> I guess it's good to want to defend this country, and it's okay to provide > alternative theories (some are good, some aren't), but there's just way too much on > the 'WTF' side of the scale to cast a huge doubt on the "official story". I guess > that's why I lean towards the 'Truthers' side. > > Sorry to anyone that doesn't feel that way.
Well, just to put it out there, I hadn't really looked into the whole "truther" thing much, assuming it was all just fringe conspiracy theories. It wasn't until some post (last year IIRC) when URHereNow said something about googling pictures of the Pentagon impact. I did out of idle curiosity, and it really didn't add up with the official story. Since then I've done some more research, and plenty of other parts of the official story don't make sense in my mind, either. I could say that URHN and you have turned have turned me into a bit of a "truther" as well.
|
|