|
Tomu Breidah |
|
No Problems, Only Solutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 08/14/04
|
|
Posts: 6819
|
|
Loc: Neither here, nor there.
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
Re: perfect example [nt]
09/17/11 05:09 PM
|
|
|
> I don't get it. That idiotic link has a video that shows buildings collapsing from
> fire... and not a single one collapsed like building seven. Not even close. Pretty
> much all of the aftermath shots show most of the framework still there!
Perhaps I missed it but did it say anything about the Put Options for the stocks on those airlines? Do they have a "scientific" explanation for that? Why there were no videos from the pentagon and surrounding businesses (oh yeah, the FBI confiscated those). Also, why did the lease holder take out an insurance policy on the 2 buildings a short time before?
Another thing I didn't like about it is their sarcastic tone peppered here and there. They could at least try to act mature in a sense and try to convey that the ideas they present could be an alternate explanation. But no. "Conspiracy Theorists" are crackpots.
So apparently it's NOT crazy to believe everything our government tells us...? They've never lied to the American people before?
I guess it's good to want to defend this country, and it's okay to provide alternative theories (some are good, some aren't), but there's just way too much on the 'WTF' side of the scale to cast a huge doubt on the "official story". I guess that's why I lean towards the 'Truthers' side.
Sorry to anyone that doesn't feel that way. 
LEVEL-4
Edited by T0M (09/17/11 05:11 PM)
|
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: perfect example [nt]
Reply
