MAMEWorld >> EmuChat
View all threads Index   Flat Mode Flat  

Anonymous
Unregistered
Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME
07/05/11 03:25 PM



Quote:


I think you're just sorry because you couldn't set everything as global variables to solve your problems. :P At least that's what most C# programmers use to call a constraint. The good code is not made by the language you use (though it helps) but the programmer.

Now you will tell us everyone should still use assembler to speed up emulation after year 2000. Good luck maintaining code through SVN like that.






No the die is cast and the MAME project already committed on its chosen path and impractical to deviate.

Assembler? Yes for speed & No for maintenance. Yes for a closed project, No for every Tom, Dick & Robert.

C# is great for the beginner for what it does and lol at your global gag.

Good code is not my argument. Only intelligent code and methods to achieve it, is.







Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* C versus C++ with regard to MAME mogli 07/04/11 07:09 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME byuu  07/06/11 12:14 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME AeroCityMayor  07/05/11 05:44 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME mogli  07/06/11 06:56 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 06:05 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME byuu  07/06/11 12:20 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Bryan Ischo  07/06/11 06:52 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME italieAdministrator  07/06/11 02:43 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME italieAdministrator  07/04/11 11:57 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/04/11 10:54 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME TafoidAdministrator  07/04/11 11:09 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 10:17 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME BIOS-D  07/05/11 12:26 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 03:25 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Olivier Galibert  07/05/11 10:27 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 11:52 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 02:29 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 03:42 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Heihachi_73  07/06/11 04:44 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 04:13 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 04:39 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 04:45 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME TheGuru  07/05/11 11:25 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 05:39 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME zambr  07/06/11 06:12 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 06:07 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME byuu  07/06/11 01:00 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Bryan Ischo  07/06/11 01:36 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Bryan Ischo  07/05/11 06:51 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Olivier Galibert  07/05/11 06:03 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 07:18 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Olivier Galibert  07/06/11 08:38 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 07:34 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME lharms  07/06/11 04:03 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME CrapBoardSoftware  07/04/11 10:16 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Roman  07/04/11 11:02 PM

Extra information Permissions
Moderator:  Robbbert, Tafoid 
0 registered and 311 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
Thread views: 3745