MAMEWorld >> EmuChat
View all threads Index   Flat Mode Flat  

R. Belmont
Cuckoo for IGAvania
Reged: 09/21/03
Posts: 9716
Loc: ECV-197 The Orville
Send PM
Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME
07/05/11 02:29 PM


> > > If MAME reverted back to C, I'm sure there would be less bloat and more
> efficiency
> > > without having resort to Moore's poor excuse, as I have seen it so many times,
> > posted
> > > here.
> >
> > You've just proven your incompetence.
>
> Elaborate.

MAME was 100% C until about a year ago, and it was equally slow then. All of the top slowest drivers (Naomi, Model 3, System 2x) are *still* 100% C (although OG's restructuring Naomi as device classes now, which will finally make it readable). QED.







Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* C versus C++ with regard to MAME mogli 07/04/11 07:09 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME byuu  07/06/11 12:14 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME AeroCityMayor  07/05/11 05:44 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME mogli  07/06/11 06:56 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 06:05 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME byuu  07/06/11 12:20 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Bryan Ischo  07/06/11 06:52 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME italieAdministrator  07/06/11 02:43 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME italieAdministrator  07/04/11 11:57 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/04/11 10:54 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME TafoidAdministrator  07/04/11 11:09 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 10:17 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME BIOS-D  07/05/11 12:26 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 03:25 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Olivier Galibert  07/05/11 10:27 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 11:52 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 02:29 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 03:42 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Heihachi_73  07/06/11 04:44 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 04:13 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 04:39 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 04:45 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME TheGuru  07/05/11 11:25 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 05:39 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME zambr  07/06/11 06:12 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 06:07 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME byuu  07/06/11 01:00 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Bryan Ischo  07/06/11 01:36 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Bryan Ischo  07/05/11 06:51 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Olivier Galibert  07/05/11 06:03 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Anonymous  07/05/11 07:18 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Olivier Galibert  07/06/11 08:38 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME R. Belmont  07/05/11 07:34 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME lharms  07/06/11 04:03 AM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME CrapBoardSoftware  07/04/11 10:16 PM
. * Re: C versus C++ with regard to MAME Roman  07/04/11 11:02 PM

Extra information Permissions
Moderator:  Robbbert, Tafoid 
0 registered and 256 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
Thread views: 3745