> As stated on the description, if you believe the value is a '1' but you're not sure, > type 'H'. If it looks like is a '0', type 'L'. If you can't tell what value is, just > type '?'.
Yeah, there are going to be some bits that are very difficult to discern with this one. Please do your best using the advice above, and I'll see what I can do once everyone weighs in.
> BTW, I'm sorry my first image had no gutter, description was not very clear. So if I > got this right and for a image filled with zeros it should look like this.
Understood. It sounds like the consensus is that the description, images, and presentation are much more confusing this time than the previous times. I apologize to all the people who have posted their issues, and appreciate y'all being patient with us.
Don't worry about the gutters and formatting and stuff. I go in by hand after everything is complete and fix the spacing, analyze the differences of opinions, and generally tidy things up, so it's no big deal. It's still work, but it's nowhere near as much work as typing it all in myself. *Everything* is appreciated.
> 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 > > 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000 > 00000000 00000000
Yeah, the lines above are what one would expect. I should have said this earlier - 8x8 bits on the top-left, 8x8 bits on the top-right, 8x8 bits on the bottom-left, and 8x8 bits on the bottom-right. As I mentioned to xiaou2 earlier, there may be some image cutting issues though, so I'll look into that when the administration tool gets some tuning.
> EDIT: Damn it, misread the question. Just forget it. ^_^U
No worries. The more questions and answers I read, the more of an understanding I get of how this stuff looks to people.
Thanks for your input and your time! Andrew
|