|
|
Re: I anticipated that response, but thought I'd not show off...
03/04/11 06:46 PM
|
|
|
> > > What other answer could there be?
> >
> > One in which you actually cite these 'agencies' who are better funded than the AHA.
> > Rather than just saying 'Yeah, there's lots of groups out there doing this, and I
> > have a hot girlfriend in Canada.'
>
> Sorry. I don't have any hot girl friends anywhere. By your or my standards.
> Regardless of physical form, women are social addicts, and that's a syndrome I just
> can't promote.
>
> Anyways, here's a list of companies. But, um, if the AHA is so well funded...why are
> common folk contributing to it.
It's a non-profit as are most organizations like it. Methinks that leaving research of this type in the hands of for profit companies is not the best idea as they will focus on those areas that will make them money (hair growth, stiffies, etc). The AHA involves itself with hospitals like the Cleveland Clinic, University Hospital and Johns Hopkins (Many others as well, these just come to mind now), where 'real world' research is being one. (that whole treating patients thing generates an amazing amount of data).
And 'Common Folk' contribute to said hospitals as well.
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
|
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: I anticipated that response, but thought I'd not show off...
Reply
