> I think he was just saying that most probably you were starting from hydro.chd as > input and converting it to a hydro_new.chd as output > I doubt he was claiming filenames do any difference: if you first changed name to > your chd from hydro to hydro_old and then you used your command line, of course you > got the same result of his command line
That's what I did.
> the only thing to avoid is > > chdman copy -i hydro.chd -o hydro.chd > > which would overwrite your original file when starting the process and you'd lose it > if anything goes wrong
Yep, which is why I renamed it to hydro_old first!