MAMEWorld >> News
Index   Flat Mode Flat  

Spelunker
In need of a new user name
Reged: 06/02/12
Posts: 38
Send PM
Re: MAME 0.146u1
06/12/12 11:31 PM



Quote:


It's also been demonstrated repeatedly that emulators in general and MAME in particular have performance profiles unlike anything else people commonly run on Intel CPUs. I strongly suggest not holding your breath.



Yes I've benchmarked Mame previously with PGO and the results were very different across a range of emulated arcade systems with some gaining basically nothing while others gained ~15-20%, will be interesting to see what x32 can offer, given how cpu bound Mame is.

Also while I assume by 'Intel CPUs' you meant the x86 acrhitecture, I'd just wanted to point out that x32 won't benefit Intel 64-bit cpu's more than AMD 64-bit cpu's as the only thing it does is to allow using the full x86_64 register set together with 32-bit pointers rather than 64-bit pointers, thus making the code footprint smaller.


Quote:


I do appreciate people ginning up new things I'll end up having to support though :P This is why Windows keeps winning.












Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* MAME 0.146u1 Robbbert 06/11/12 10:38 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 kevenz  06/15/12 02:11 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 etabeta  06/15/12 08:02 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 apeman  06/12/12 08:02 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 ranger_lennier  06/13/12 04:36 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 Sune  06/13/12 05:14 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 jflatt  06/12/12 03:51 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 Spelunker  06/12/12 01:15 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 R. Belmont  06/12/12 06:23 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 Spelunker  06/12/12 09:08 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 R. Belmont  06/12/12 09:33 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 Spelunker  06/12/12 11:31 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 Cyberzinho Punk  06/11/12 09:33 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 John IVModerator  06/11/12 07:12 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 joey35car  06/15/12 07:49 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 ranger_lennier  06/17/12 03:40 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 joey35car  06/18/12 04:47 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 John IVModerator  06/16/12 12:04 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 CiroConsentino  06/12/12 01:23 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 Quantum Leaper  06/11/12 10:37 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 RobbbertModerator  06/12/12 02:49 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 redk9258  06/12/12 03:51 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 SmitdoggAdministrator  06/12/12 12:08 AM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 Quantum Leaper  06/14/12 09:05 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 SmitdoggAdministrator  06/14/12 09:12 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 AntoPISA  06/11/12 05:35 PM
. * Re: MAME 0.146u1 Chism  06/11/12 02:05 PM
. * MAME_0.146u1b_32-bit... redk9258  06/11/12 12:15 PM
. * Re: MAME_0.146u1b_32-bit... Scimmia85  06/11/12 07:28 PM
. * Re: MAME_0.146u1b_32-bit... AntoPISA  06/11/12 05:36 PM
. * Re: MAME_0.146u1b_32-bit... s_bastian  06/11/12 01:34 PM
. * Re: MAME_0.146u1b_32-bit... KingTut  06/11/12 12:22 PM
. * MAME_0.146u1b_64-bit... redk9258  06/11/12 12:05 PM
. * Did you update CHDMAN? DiodeDude  06/11/12 11:03 PM
. * Re: Did you update CHDMAN? Lewis King  06/11/12 11:26 PM
. * Re: Did you update CHDMAN? DiodeDude  06/11/12 11:30 PM
. * Re: Did you update CHDMAN? Lewis King  06/11/12 11:33 PM
. * Re: Did you update CHDMAN? Wheeley  06/11/12 11:38 PM
. * Re: Did you update CHDMAN? R. Belmont  06/12/12 06:26 PM
. * Re: Did you update CHDMAN? Roman  07/04/12 11:14 PM
. * Re: Did you update CHDMAN? Roman  06/18/12 08:22 AM
. * Re: MAME_0.146u1b_64-bit... CptGuapo  06/11/12 03:45 PM
. * Re: MAME_0.146u1b_64-bit... Lewis King  06/11/12 01:48 PM

Extra information Permissions
Moderator:  John IV, Robbbert, Tafoid 
0 registered and 220 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
Thread views: 6446