> > And you're still gambling that you can decode the video digitally better than your > > laser disc player. > > Considering some of the players in question predated comb filters, I'm willing to bet > JD could make a better decoder.
Plus, the decoder can be refined in the near or far future as long as it has good source data to work with.
Decoding isn't mandatory either; the video signal can be output again to a PC capture card or TV, etc.