> You do know that's the pure definition of a troll, right?
Not if the accusation is justified. There's a difference between
"Let's see how much the Obama fanboys get pissed off when I tell them that Obama is a communist"
and
"Let's see how much the Obama fanboys get pissed off when I tell them that he didn't manage to close Guantanamo, as he promised."
Trolls usually make up statements and don't justify their view. On the other hand, while my thread might have been provoking, the actual content of the statement is still meant totally seriously. A development team who calls the most important part of a program "a nice side effect", but at the same time puts much time and energy to improve this very part, even though it has nothing to do with their "official" goal (documenting PBCs), is a ridiculous situation.
> I'm thinking the word 'again' is your tell.
This was not referring to my previous posts, but to the fact that the development team tends to get pissed off or react in a bitter way quite often. At least, that's what I observed in the past. Not in my own threads, but in the way they act here in general. They always have a "If you don't like it, fuck off!" mentality.
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: Question about MAME's intended purpose
Reply
