> I don't know why you quote parts of other messages in an answer to my message.
Because the tree structure in forums is shit. If I write an answer, I usually summarize everything into one message. No need to write one message per person and to create countless branches. Forums threads should work in a linear way because that's the way communication works in real life. This time, I wrote three posts, one to each answer.
You see how messy this will eventually become?
> So I haven't torn down each and every of your assumptions (note that I haven't even
> tried to use the word affirmations) because it seems it would be futile to argue with
> someone as "enlightened" as you (quotes intended as sarcasm, to avoid confusion). You
> will not either understand the condom analogy, so I'll spare you of it so you can
> feel better with yourself. To sum up each and every refutation of each and every
> statement you might make regarding these matters in the future, I'll use three words:
> * Wrong.
> * Are.
> * You.
>
> Order them in any way you want, for entertainment purposes.
Yeah, funny. You know what I like about the internet? People don't care if someone is just trolling or if he actually tries to make logical statements. If they don't agree with him, they will consider him a troll.
Look at my previous posts: Did I merely say: "I'm right, you're wrong"? Didn't I give specific answers to various statements, trying to refute them one by one? If you think this is stupid, what kind of dicussion would you accept? What kind of statements by me would you take seriously? If your answer is: "None, because you're a troll", well, there you have it: No matter what I write, if good or bad arguments, you will always consider it bad arguments by default.
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: Question about MAME's intended purpose
Reply
