MAMEWorld >> EmuChat
Index   Flat Mode Flat  

Bryan Ischo
MAME Fan
Reged: 03/28/10
Posts: 358
Send PM
Re: Okay Debbi Downer...
04/23/13 02:27 AM


> Take it for what it is, not for what it could be. The idea is novel, yes, but
> fascinating none the less.
>
> I agree he's a douche...

I also agree that it is entertaining and a novel approach to writing a game playing "A.I.". I had meant to thank you for posting the link but forgot to as I got caught up in reading the white paper.

I was thinking after I wrote my original post that I did sound kind of down on it, which is just an artifact of my typically abrupt writing style.

I'm all for people having creative ideas and trying them out. I was just trying to address the perception that what had been accomplished was more than it actually was - especially the notion that this playfun thing was 'taking advantage of glitches'. It was really just benefitting from glitches that happened to occur when it threw down some random controller inputs, in a one-off fashion.

Edited by Bryan Ischo (04/23/13 02:34 AM)







Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis italieAdministrator 04/15/13 02:07 AM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis Bryan Ischo  04/22/13 09:53 PM
. * Okay Debbi Downer... italieAdministrator  04/23/13 02:11 AM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... Bryan Ischo  04/23/13 02:27 AM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... DMala  04/23/13 07:27 AM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... Bryan Ischo  04/23/13 08:36 AM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... Anonymous  04/25/13 04:53 PM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... R. Belmont  04/23/13 08:05 PM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... RetroRepair  04/25/13 03:06 AM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... DMala  04/25/13 06:26 AM
. * Re: Okay Debbi Downer... Tomu Breidah  04/23/13 05:00 AM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis DMala  04/15/13 05:10 AM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis R. Belmont  04/15/13 06:14 PM
. * Neat try, but not really comparable. Firehawke  04/16/13 04:40 AM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Anonymous  04/22/13 12:01 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. GatKong  04/23/13 08:38 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Bryan Ischo  04/24/13 09:50 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Anonymous  04/30/13 07:45 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Olivier Galibert  04/30/13 03:23 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Anonymous  04/28/13 12:34 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. R. Belmont  04/25/13 04:52 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Vas Crabb  04/26/13 03:31 AM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Anonymous  04/28/13 12:37 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. italieAdministrator  04/28/13 03:55 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Anonymous  04/29/13 04:12 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. R. Belmont  04/29/13 05:07 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Anonymous  04/29/13 06:23 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Vas Crabb  04/29/13 07:26 PM
. * Re: Neat try, but not really comparable. Anonymous  04/30/13 03:30 PM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis StilettoAdministrator  04/15/13 08:25 PM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis Anonymous  04/15/13 11:16 PM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis StilettoAdministrator  04/15/13 11:27 PM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis R. Belmont  04/16/13 05:28 PM
. * Re: AWESOME paper on beating Super Mario A.I. with RAM analysis Tomu Breidah  04/15/13 04:26 AM

Extra information Permissions
Moderator:  Robbbert, Tafoid 
0 registered and 127 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
Thread views: 2717