|
Re: Not bad for a wireless set, I think.... (nt)
09/11/16 10:29 PM
|
|
|
> I'd give them credit for being wireless earbuds that actually don't have wires, rather than the normal ones that are still wired to each other, but on searching I find Amazon lists half a dozen or more that also manage that, for less money. (Ignore the popular result that shows two for under $20 but is really just two angles of the single piece.) There are more expensive ones, as well. Others seem to be offering the complaint that they'll get lost because Apple's design doesn't fit ears properly, but I've no experience with that. > It comes down to quality, and sound quality in particular. Apple hasn't seemed concerned with sound in the past. They bought Beats, after all. This time they're focusing on that microchip.
Hmmm. I don't keep up with any of these things. I was going by the retail cost of my Plantronics Voyager Pro, which is at least a hundred bucks I think a few years ago. I bought mine used/refurb/etc, of course. I don't listen to music via my phone or other device....I don't know as I would even on a trip, though it's something to think about....so I don't have a stereo set.
Scifi frauds. SF illuminates.
_________________
Culture General Contact Unit (Eccentric)
|
|