|
New Ghostbusters movie
#359300 - 10/04/16 12:42 AM
|
|
|
Nothing to do with all women cast but it looks like absolute shit from the commercials. Like absolute, shit. As for the anti-women people, they could have dodged all trouble by simply calling it "Ghostbusters 3" instead of a reboot (a.k.a. replacement), so first off they are dumb as a rock, but after watching all the commercials, it doesn't look funny AT ALL.
|
|
|
| Dullaron |
|
Diablo III - Dunard #1884
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 07/22/05
|
|
Posts: 6125
|
|
Loc: Fort Worth, Tx
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: New Ghostbusters movie
[Re: Smitdogg]
#359325 - 10/04/16 01:19 PM
|
|
|
> Nothing to do with all women cast but it looks like absolute shit from the
> commercials. Like absolute, shit. As for the anti-women people, they could have
> dodged all trouble by simply calling it "Ghostbusters 3" instead of a reboot (a.k.a.
> replacement), so first off they are dumb as a rock, but after watching all the
> commercials, it doesn't look funny AT ALL.
I watch it. Too silly instead of being funny. Just saying. First Ghostbusters movie killed the remake. 
Dan and the rest should've stay away from this one.
|
W11 Home 64-bit + Nobara OS / AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT / AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core 3.59 GHz / RAM 64 GB
|
|
|
Re: New Ghostbusters movie
[Re: Dullaron]
#359328 - 10/04/16 03:35 PM
|
|
|
That's exactly how it looks. Like they got 4 comedians and told them to run around trying to act as silly as possible and assumed that would end up being funny. Kind of reminds me of Wild Hogs.
|
|
|
| Tomu Breidah |
|
No Problems, Only Solutions
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 08/14/04
|
|
Posts: 6819
|
|
Loc: Neither here, nor there.
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: New Ghostbusters movie
[Re: Smitdogg]
#359371 - 10/05/16 07:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: New Ghostbusters movie
[Re: Tomu Breidah]
#359380 - 10/05/16 03:29 PM
|
|
|
I generally don't read breitbart but I'll look if someone links to it I guess. I sometimes look at foxnews to see how far low they will sink for the right but breitbart straight up props up racist trolls as brilliant kings. It's the worst thing we've probably ever seen for "news". That's who Clinton meant by deplorables, them and the people who comment there and on drudge. I can't believe she apologized for saying that. It was her only good line.
For the record I'm not a democrat. I consider myself alt-center which is a group I created and am the eternal leader of. But clearly I'd pick democrats over what Trump has turned the 2016 GOP into.
|
|
|
|
Re: New Ghostbusters movie
[Re: Smitdogg]
#359387 - 10/05/16 07:20 PM
|
|
|
Hasn't this been in the cheap theatres for at least weeks already?........
|
Scifi frauds. SF illuminates.
_________________
Culture General Contact Unit (Eccentric)
|
|
|
Re: New Ghostbusters movie
[Re: Traso]
#359392 - 10/05/16 07:37 PM
|
|
|
Thanks for another pointless reply.
|
|
|
|
Re: New Ghostbusters movie
[Re: Smitdogg]
#359407 - 10/05/16 10:10 PM
|
|
|
> Thanks for another pointless reply.
You're such a goofball. Meaning, you're just talking about this now?....like it's a new thing? The movie. Not my posting.
|
Scifi frauds. SF illuminates.
_________________
Culture General Contact Unit (Eccentric)
|
|
|
Re: New Ghostbusters movie
[Re: Traso]
#359408 - 10/05/16 10:18 PM
|
|
|
Because they just now started bombarding me on Roku with its commercials.
|
|
|
Index 
Threaded 
New Ghostbusters movie
Reply
[Re: 
