|
New MAME Benchmarks tomorrow.
#343433 - 08/04/15 12:16 PM
|
|
|
This turned up at work today 
Will have MAME performance numbers to share tomorrow. 
-bench 90 on the usual suspects:
Blitz
Dolphin
Gauntleg
Gradius4
Propcycl
Radikalb
Scud
Starsldr
64bit MAME 0.141 and 0.164 @ Stock and Overclock.
|
If all else fails, Burn the manual.
|
|
|
Re: New MAME Benchmarks today
[Re: taz-nz]
#343475 - 08/05/15 10:28 AM
|
|
|
As promised here are some quick and duty benchmarks numbers for the new 6th Gen Core-i7.
Please note: 4770k benchmarks were preformed on Windows 7 64bit, where as new benchmarks were done on Windows 10 64bit.
MAME 0.164 64bit:
4770k @ 4.0ghz gen6 @ 4.0ghz gen6 @ 4.8ghz
Biltz 290.58 321.35 377.20
Dolphin 40.39 44.63 52.34
Gauntleg 378.72 440.78 516.63
Gardius4 232.98 255.83 305.57
Propcycl 169.62 179.04 207.42
Radikalb 240.66 269.81 324.87
Scud 87.87 94.74 111.01
Starsldr 106.32 118.32 141.64
MAME 0.141 64bit: (for reference with old benchmarks)
4770k @ 4.0ghz Gen6 @ 4.0ghz 4770k @ 4.8ghz gen6 @ 4.8ghz
Biltz 312.07 321.35 369.40 377.20
Dolphin 46.96 44.63 49.36 52.34
Gauntleg 420.95 440.78 503.17 516.63
Gardius4 244.74 255.83 290.16 305.57
Propcycl 257.43 179.04 303.46 207.42
Radikalb 268.90 269.81 319.78 324.87
Scud 145.91 94.74 174.07 111.01
Starsldr 84.68 118.32 101.34 141.64
There is defiantly a 7-10% gain in Performance per clock, but I was hoping for more.
The 4.8ghz overclock was quick in duty it was not stable in Prime95, CPU was rock solid at 4.5ghz, but overclock was likely limited to this by very average air cooling, and mid range motherboard VRM.
Water cooling, possibly a Delid, Overclocking motherboard with better VRM, and more time spend tweaking voltages will likely result in better overclocks at a later date.
|
If all else fails, Burn the manual.
|
|
| B2K24 |
|
MAME @ 15 kHz Sony Trinitron CRT user
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 10/25/10
|
|
Posts: 2663
|
|
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: New MAME Benchmarks today
[Re: taz-nz]
#343485 - 08/05/15 04:31 PM
|
|
|
Thanks a lot for posting your benching information.
I'm overdue for a new build possibly in the next few months
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Re: New MAME Benchmarks today
[Re: taz-nz]
#343486 - 08/05/15 04:47 PM
|
|
|
Thank you! I am also deciding on what CPU to get for my new build... and MAME performance is probably my top criterion. There's still no substitute for clock speed, eh?
|
|
|
|
Re: New MAME Benchmarks today
[Re: taz-nz]
#343487 - 08/05/15 04:58 PM
|
|
|
Are your #'s for Gen6 under MAME 0.141 correct?
|
|
|
| R. Belmont |
|
Cuckoo for IGAvania
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
|
Posts: 9716
|
|
Loc: ECV-197 The Orville
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: New MAME Benchmarks today
[Re: taz-nz]
#343492 - 08/05/15 06:23 PM
|
|
|
> As promised here are some quick and duty benchmarks numbers for the new 6th Gen
> Core-i7.
So that's the i7-6700K? [H]ardOCP indicated it's stable on air at 4.7 and pretty low voltages (and even achieves relatively low thermals in that case), but 4.8 seems impossible. Even so, the speeds at stock clocks look great.
Edited by R. Belmont (08/05/15 06:25 PM)
|
|
|
|
Re: New MAME Benchmarks today
[Re: 2600]
#343493 - 08/05/15 06:32 PM
|
|
|
> Are your #'s for Gen6 under MAME 0.141 correct?
Or for MAME 0.164. For both versions the measurements match to the second decimal. That just doesn't look right.
|
|
|
|
Re: New MAME Benchmarks today
[Re: R. Belmont]
#343503 - 08/05/15 11:49 PM
|
|
|
> So that's the i7-6700K? [H]ardOCP indicated it's stable on air at 4.7 and pretty low voltages (and even achieves relatively low thermals in that case), but 4.8 seems impossible. Even so, the speeds at stock clocks look great.
Yeah, impressive. Thread sticky!
|
Scifi frauds. SF illuminates.
_________________
Culture General Contact Unit (Eccentric)
|
|
Stiletto |
|
They're always after me Lucky ROMS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 03/07/04
|
|
Posts: 6472
|
|
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: New MAME Benchmarks tomorrow.
[Re: taz-nz]
#344310 - 08/23/15 07:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: New MAME Benchmarks tomorrow.
[Re: Stiletto]
#344314 - 08/23/15 09:49 PM
|
|
|
> Weird discovery over at VOGONS: taz-nz's benchmarks were swiped by some
> content-reposting blog. Use Google Cache to get it to load properly.
> https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s...=clnk&gl=us
>
> - Stiletto
Honestly, I have to ask, what is it with people in third-world countries where they constantly re-post other peoples' content?
|
|
|
| TrevEB |
|
Brokering peace between the collectors and the Mame Community
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 03/11/05
|
|
Posts: 770
|
|
Loc: Oakland, CA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: New MAME Benchmarks today
[Re: B2K24]
#345607 - 09/27/15 11:00 PM
|
|
|
My office gave me a sweet new Lenovo ThinkStation for ArchiCAD and AutoCAD work. Here are some benchmarks for a
6 core Xeon processor.
MAME 0.165 64bit
Windows 7 64bit
(Xeon E5-1650ver3 @ 3.5ghz)--vs--(i7-6700k @ 4.0ghz)
6 cores--------------------vs--4 cores
24gb Ram
Blitz: 264------------321
Dolphin: 27------------44
gauntleg: 275--------440
Gradius: 198----------255
Propcycl: 136--------179
Radikalb: 190---------269
Scud: 146-------------94
Starsldr: 116---------118
Perhaps of interest: I use the "All CPU Meter" gadget that shows activity from the 6 x2 cores. For the most part activity among the cores was sporadic. Starslder however showed activity equally spread out among the 6 physical cores with no multi-threading.
The performance of the xeon chip compared with others mentioned in the forum placed it based on its cpu speed except for starsldr where it clearly excelled though the i7-6700k running at 4ghz beat it just barely with a score of 118.32
Bottom line, unless the xeon chip is good at overclocking, its not worth the extra $200 or so for the 6 core chip.
The i7-6700k is a very impressive cpu
TrevEB
|
|
|
Index 
Threaded 
New MAME Benchmarks tomorrow.
Reply
[Re: 
