|
CG porn: Better than the real thing?
#340692 - 05/30/15 04:25 AM
|
|
|
|
|
| Foxhack |
|
Furry guy
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 01/30/04
|
|
Posts: 2409
|
|
Loc: Spicy Canada
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Uh... we can post this stuff at teh bin? *nt*
[Re: mike20599]
#340731 - 05/30/15 06:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ain't nothin wrong with tha boobs.....
[Re: Foxhack]
#340888 - 06/01/15 11:45 PM
|
|
|
It's the porn links....
|
Scifi frauds. SF illuminates.
_________________
Culture General Contact Unit (Eccentric)
|
|
|
Nice boob physics here:
[Re: mike20599]
#341178 - 06/07/15 02:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
| Dullaron |
|
Diablo III - Dunard #1884
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 07/22/05
|
|
Posts: 6125
|
|
Loc: Fort Worth, Tx
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: CG porn: Better than the real thing?
[Re: mike20599]
#341183 - 06/07/15 05:29 PM
|
|
|
> This Umemaro3D guy doesn't use the best tech, but he's one of the best animators.
> http://www115.sakura.ne.jp/~umemaro3d/UmeTop1.html
Look like Yuffie Kisaragi from Final Fantasy 7. 
|
W11 Home 64-bit + Nobara OS / AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT / AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core 3.59 GHz / RAM 64 GB
|
|
|
Looks cookie-cutter to me......
[Re: mike20599]
#341206 - 06/08/15 12:48 AM
|
|
|
The only things right in that model is the hips...well, leg type hips anyways.....and the skin tone. I like a narrow waist, but Christ that's almost unreal.
|
Scifi frauds. SF illuminates.
_________________
Culture General Contact Unit (Eccentric)
|
|
| Moose |
|
Don't make me assume my ultimate form!
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 05/03/04
|
|
Posts: 1483
|
|
Loc: Outback, Australia
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: Nice boob physics here:
[Re: mike20599]
#341255 - 06/09/15 01:49 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Nice boob physics here:
[Re: mike20599]
#341257 - 06/09/15 02:38 AM
|
|
|
|
|
| Dullaron |
|
Diablo III - Dunard #1884
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 07/22/05
|
|
Posts: 6125
|
|
Loc: Fort Worth, Tx
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: Looks cookie-cutter to me......
[Re: Traso]
#341264 - 06/09/15 04:14 AM
|
|
|
> The only things right in that model is the hips...well, leg type hips anyways.....and
> the skin tone. I like a narrow waist, but Christ that's almost unreal.
Make Bruce Jenner look better. Just kidding. lol
|
W11 Home 64-bit + Nobara OS / AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT / AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core 3.59 GHz / RAM 64 GB
|
|
|
Re: Nice boob physics here:
[Re: krick]
#341266 - 06/09/15 05:42 AM
|
|
|
How am I supposed to get any work done now?
|
Pessimist: Oh, this can't get any worse!
Optimist: Yes, it can!
|
|
|
And if you want more stylized boobs...
[Re: mike20599]
#341294 - 06/10/15 02:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
No, it isn't
[Re: mike20599]
#341300 - 06/10/15 05:12 AM
|
|
|
All the shit you're posting looks completely unnatural in one way or another. The skin in that UMEMARO3D stuff doesn't look right at all. It looks more like silicone than skin with all that specular reflection, and look at what happens when joints bend - it doesn't stretch/wrinkle/fold properly. It's just too unrealistic to be much of a turn-on.
|
|
|
|
Re: No, it isn't
[Re: Vas Crabb]
#341313 - 06/10/15 12:13 PM
|
|
|
> All the shit you're posting looks completely unnatural in one way or another. The
> skin in that UMEMARO3D stuff doesn't look right at all. It looks more like silicone
> than skin with all that specular reflection, and look at what happens when joints
> bend - it doesn't stretch/wrinkle/fold properly. It's just too unrealistic to be much
> of a turn-on.
Thank you. All I ever focus on when I try to look at 3D-rendered porn is that the skin looks more like plastic or silicone, the skinning is shameful, and to be quite honest the animation is B-reel at best.
For really decent 3D porn you'd need materials artists and riggers of the quality that you see at the VFX companies that do major Hollywood movies, and do you really think that a person with that skill set is going to be doing 3D porn?
Not to mention the animation. It's all clearly hand-animated, like slightly smoother stop-motion. If they tried to go for more cartoony, squash-and-stretch-type animation, that might sort of work for something like 3D anime porn or 3D furry porn, but in the former case you're still left with boring art, and in the latter case you'd have to deal with the fact that hair or fur simulation for 3D rendering is still really not that great. If you actually want fully human models in your 3D porn, you'd probably need to do the entire thing via motion capture for animation, because hand animation just won't cut it.
Then you have the simple financial problem that once you're paying two people to do the motion capture, for the cost of hiring the crew to run the mocap studio and those Hollywood-grade material artists, you can probably hire two people to just fuck for you on-camera and save a lot of money.
Hence, no good 3D porn, nor will there ever be: The financial incentive isn't there.
|
|
|
|
You're missing the point here.....
[Re: MooglyGuy]
#341400 - 06/12/15 10:57 PM
|
|
|
The kiddies are so cartoony-brained that real isn't as cool.
|
Scifi frauds. SF illuminates.
_________________
Culture General Contact Unit (Eccentric)
|
|
Index 
Threaded 
CG porn: Better than the real thing?
Reply
[Re: 
