|
I must say, effects in 1920s movies were often a bit lacking.
#314293 - 09/09/13 10:11 PM
|
|
|
Received some years back a set of Alfred Hitchcock movies, being his early work.
1929 saw "Blackmail," historic for starting out as a silent film, then being changed to a talkie early in production (the first scenes are music only).
I've just watched Alice kill this guy, using a large knife that very noticeably drew not a drop of blood. He actually has the blade in the shot for some time, being obstinately shiny.
Ah well, it is what it was.
|
|
|
| Hizzout |
|
70's baby, early 80's child
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 02/05/04
|
|
Posts: 4841
|
|
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
|
Say what you will about Hitchcock, but there are some movies from the 1920's that still got it right, even with limited technology and effects
[ATTACHED IMAGE]
|
|
|
|
Oh, certainly. Some are quite famous for their effects. (nt)
[Re: Hizzout]
#314295 - 09/09/13 11:10 PM
|
|
|
> Say what you will about Hitchcock, but there are some movies from the 1920's that
> still got it right, even with limited technology and effects
|
|
|
|
Re: I must say, effects in 1920s movies were often a bit lacking.
[Re: TriggerFin]
#314306 - 09/10/13 04:36 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Index 
Threaded 
I must say, effects in 1920s movies were often a bit lacking.
Reply
[Re: 
