> Pretty elaborate to not work because I sure as shit didn't notice Gillette signs > until reading that.
Maybe your conscious mind didn't but your unconscious mind did. Or, at least that's how those types of things are said to work.
Anyway, about the clip. If you pause it at/about 17 seconds the ball jumps position, also, why didn't the female reporter react in some way -even after realizing she nearly gotten clobbered?
> > Pretty elaborate to not work because I sure as shit didn't notice Gillette signs > > until reading that. > > Maybe your conscious mind didn't but your unconscious mind did. Or, at least that's > how those types of things are said to work.
Impressions yeah I have a degree in marketing/advertising. Maybe it didn't make one because I already use their products. Or maybe the ad didn't work like all those super bowl ads that people enjoy and talk about but can't remember what product it endorsed...
> Anyway, about the clip. If you pause it at/about 17 seconds the ball jumps position, > also, why didn't the female reporter react in some way -even after realizing she > nearly gotten clobbered?
I thought that but maybe she is a straight up slow moron and reacted after the fact... There would be other coverage if that were the case though. Anyway it looks like an interesting ad but it didn't really work, it didn't leave a Gillette impression on me, maybe it worked on others though? Actually, maybe if I saw it in HD on a huge TV it would work? There would be big Gillettes. Not on that tiny dickless YT box. Tiny, and dickless, why tee box of vaginas on interwebs. Or maybe they knew we would eventually talk about them and that is their impression? Now I want to actually stop using their products if that is true.
> > Pretty elaborate to not work because I sure as shit didn't notice Gillette signs > > until reading that. > > Maybe your conscious mind didn't but your unconscious mind did. Or, at least that's > how those types of things are said to work. > > Anyway, about the clip. If you pause it at/about 17 seconds the ball jumps position, > also, why didn't the female reporter react in some way -even after realizing she > nearly gotten clobbered? > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMujgAAyH-I
At 360p you have to know they're Gillette ads to recognize them. I haven't shaved. In the original, you CAN see them, yes.
She DID react, if you listen carefully. It just wasn't much of a reaction.
> > > Pretty elaborate to not work because I sure as shit didn't notice Gillette signs > > > until reading that. > > > > Maybe your conscious mind didn't but your unconscious mind did. Or, at least that's > > how those types of things are said to work. > > > > Anyway, about the clip. If you pause it at/about 17 seconds the ball jumps > position, > > also, why didn't the female reporter react in some way -even after realizing she > > nearly gotten clobbered? > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tMujgAAyH-I > > At 360p you have to know they're Gillette ads to recognize them. I haven't shaved. In > the original, you CAN see them, yes. > > She DID react, if you listen carefully. It just wasn't much of a reaction.
Could tell it's fake simply from the graphics overlay package used by the broadcaster. That's not something anyone would use for interviewing a major league baseball player, no it's not....
> > That reporter didn't even know what happened!!! > > I read the comments on YouTube. But first thought... "Who the hell threw that ball? > Some idiot/racist?" > > But watching it again and closer I see it was someone that hit the ball.
> I thought that but maybe she is a straight up slow moron and reacted after the > fact... There would be other coverage if that were the case though. Anyway it looks > like an interesting ad but it didn't really work, it didn't leave a Gillette > impression on me, maybe it worked on others though? Actually, maybe if I saw it in HD > on a huge TV it would work? There would be big Gillettes. Not on that tiny dickless > YT box. Tiny, and dickless, why tee box of vaginas on interwebs. Or maybe they knew > we would eventually talk about them and that is their impression? Now I want to > actually stop using their products if that is true.
In the Deadspin article I linked, it said they spent several hours shooting a real commercial at the field. The viral video was shot in two minutes right at the end of the session.
> > > That reporter didn't even know what happened!!! > > > > I read the comments on YouTube. But first thought... "Who the hell threw that ball? > > Some idiot/racist?" > > > > But watching it again and closer I seen it was someone that hit the ball. > > > A racists batter no doubt.
Yeah yeah. I seen the batter was black at the same time as ^.
Because when I assumed it was thrown I also assumed someone knew what they were doing (e.g. they intended the ball to curve towards the reporter).
> Could tell it's fake simply from the graphics overlay package used by the > broadcaster. That's not something anyone would use for interviewing a major league > baseball player, no it's not.... > > - Stiletto
I'd never claim it wasn't fake. Just that the quality of the copy we were shown first sucked too much to notice the Gillette ads, and that there WAS a reaction by the "reporter."
Index 
Threaded 
From out of nowhere, supermodel Eva Longoria saves this reporters life!
Reply
/Eva%20Longoria/eva-longoria-67a.jpg)
[Re: 
Yeah yeah. I seen the batter was black at the same time as ^. 
Just that the quality of the copy we were shown first sucked too much to notice the Gillette ads, and that there WAS a reaction by the "reporter."
