I wonder if it would work on a modern i3 laptop with Intel integrated graphics. I know the older Intel graphics was really underpowered and awful, but I think the newer ones have gotten somewhat better.
I had heard this or something like it was in development, but lost track of it after the whole rhythm game fad fizzled.
> eta: But it requires 256 MB of Dedicated Video RAM and I only have 64 MB. > > Off-topic, that makes 4 games I've wanted to play but couldn't. *sigh*... well, crap.
You should consider getting a machine that was made in this decade. Seriously, my video card is *ancient* and I have almost 1GB of dedicated Video RAM.
> I had heard this or something like it was in development, but lost track of it after > the whole rhythm game fad fizzled. >
Yeah. That was the first thought I had too. It was a topic Hizzout posted....
ETA:
> You should consider getting a machine that was made in this decade. Seriously, my > video card is *ancient* and I have almost 1GB of dedicated Video RAM.
I bought a laptop earlier this year, and I was looking for something in/around the $500.00 range. It's a Win7, Intel i3...
> I bought a laptop earlier this year, and I was looking for something in/around the > $500.00 range. It's a Win7, Intel i3...
Yeah, laptops have never been very well suited to gaming, especially on the low end. You could get a desktop for $500 that would run 90%+ of the games out there with no problem at all.