|
If you're watching the elections, where are you looking?
#298578 - 11/06/12 11:34 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: If you're watching the elections, where are you looking?
[Re: TriggerFin]
#298582 - 11/07/12 12:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: If you're watching the elections, where are you looking?
[Re: krick]
#298586 - 11/07/12 02:23 AM
|
|
|
> There are no actual results yet and there won't be until the polls start closing.
> Indiana and Kentucky (portions of both) are first to close at 6pm EST.
>
> Here's a decent map of closing times...
> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82595.html
I know none had closed. I was asking to find out if there might be something better than what I linked to, which is showing results on a map as they come in.
So... Politico seems to have called Kentucky as soon as they closed, with 12% reporting, and Vermont with 0%(!) reporting.
Waiting to see Maine go with a 3-1 split and tie the election. 
|
|
|
Stiletto |
|
They're always after me Lucky ROMS!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 03/07/04
|
|
Posts: 6472
|
|
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Lack of bullshit
[Re: TriggerFin]
#298589 - 11/07/12 02:59 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Lack of bullshit
[Re: Stiletto]
#298590 - 11/07/12 03:31 AM
|
|
|
> https://www.google.com/elections/ed/us/results
>
> - Stiletto
That comes from AP. While it differs somewhat from the Politico map, they're still doing things like, for example, calling Maryland with 0.1% reporting.
They've each got the same number of electoral votes called for each (64-40 now), but from different places... no, they match now 64-51. No, they un-called OK, but added 16 (GA, light tint?) to Romney. Heh.
May as well wait for someone who cares about their reputation.
Edited by TriggerFin (11/07/12 03:37 AM)
|
|
|
|
|
With hotties like Robin Meade and Soledad O'Brien, I figured that CNN would be a good channel to watch for the news. Unfortunately, the only picture I saw was a map with a lot of blue and red on it, so I got bored and turned off the tv.
 
.
[ATTACHED IMAGE]
|
|
|
| Foxhack |
|
Furry guy
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 01/30/04
|
|
Posts: 2409
|
|
Loc: Spicy Canada
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: If you're watching the elections, where are you looking?
[Re: TriggerFin]
#298600 - 11/07/12 06:39 AM
|
|
|
> > There are no actual results yet and there won't be until the polls start closing.
> > Indiana and Kentucky (portions of both) are first to close at 6pm EST.
> >
> > Here's a decent map of closing times...
> > http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82595.html
>
> I know none had closed. I was asking to find out if there might be something better
> than what I linked to, which is showing results on a map as they come in.
>
> So... Politico seems to have called Kentucky as soon as they closed, with 12%
> reporting, and Vermont with 0%(!) reporting.
>
> Waiting to see Maine go with a 3-1 split and tie the election.
Only 4% of California has reported and news sites are already saying Obama won the state.
That doesn't make any goddamn sense. Wait until 50, 60% of the votes have been counted, not 4%.
|
|
|
| DMala |
|
Sleep is overrated
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 05/09/05
|
|
Posts: 3989
|
|
Loc: Waltham, MA
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: If you're watching the elections, where are you looking?
[Re: Gemini]
#298603 - 11/07/12 07:07 AM
|
|
|
Does anyone remember Soledad O'Brien being on a kids show in the late '80s or early '90s? I remember her doing a news segment. It was either "science news" or else the whole show was science themed, but I don't remember much else about it.
Anyhow, that's what I think of when I hear her name. It seems kind of weird to me that she's a real reporter now.
|
|
|
| italie |
|
MAME owes italie many thank yous, hah
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/20/03
|
|
Posts: 15246
|
|
Loc: BoomTown
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
meade. moar meade. <nt>
[Re: Gemini]
#298606 - 11/07/12 07:20 AM
|
|
|
> With hotties like Robin Meade and Soledad O'Brien, I figured that CNN would be a good
> channel to watch for the news. Unfortunately, the only picture I saw was a map with a
> lot of blue and red on it, so I got bored and turned off the tv.
>
>
> .
|
|
|
| Tomu Breidah |
|
No Problems, Only Solutions
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 08/14/04
|
|
Posts: 6820
|
|
Loc: Neither here, nor there.
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Mrs. Coco? [nt]
[Re: DMala]
#298618 - 11/07/12 08:29 AM
|
|
|
> Does anyone remember Soledad O'Brien being on a kids show in the late '80s or early
> '90s? I remember her doing a news segment. It was either "science news" or else the
> whole show was science themed, but I don't remember much else about it.
>
> Anyhow, that's what I think of when I hear her name. It seems kind of weird to me
> that she's a real reporter now.
Cause O'Brien.... 
|
LEVEL-4
|
|
|
If you're watching the electrons, where are you looking? -nt-
[Re: TriggerFin]
#298620 - 11/07/12 02:38 PM
|
|
|
> With 43 votes reported in New Hampshire for some reason.
|
|
|
|
Switching between TV and monitor to get caught up on the 4 days I missed. (nt)
[Re: Vas Crabb]
#298639 - 11/07/12 09:15 PM
|
|
|
|
|
| Gor |
|
Giver of truth.
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
|
Posts: 1925
|
|
Loc: The basement
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: Switching between TV and monitor to get caught up on the 4 days I missed. (nt)
[Re: TriggerFin]
#298648 - 11/07/12 11:15 PM
|
|
|
What you missed:
After billions spent, Congress and the Oval Office are pretty much unchanged.
|
Oh for Pete's sake.
loser.com
|
|
|
Re: Switching between TV and monitor to get caught up on the 4 days I missed. (nt)
[Re: Gor]
#298653 - 11/08/12 12:49 AM
|
|
|
> What you missed:
> After billions spent, Congress and the Oval Office are pretty much unchanged.
We changed from elections to electrons back there. The stuff I missed happened last week, not this:
I've found my episodes of Arrow and Supernatural, need to investigate South Park (oh wait, they'd rerun it this week if it existed, right?), then move on to Thursday.
|
|
|
|
Re: If you're watching the elections, where are you looking?
[Re: DMala]
#298658 - 11/08/12 04:06 AM
|
|
|
> Does anyone remember Soledad O'Brien being on a kids show in the late '80s or early
> '90s? I remember her doing a news segment. It was either "science news" or else the
> whole show was science themed, but I don't remember much else about it.
>
> Anyhow, that's what I think of when I hear her name. It seems kind of weird to me
> that she's a real reporter now.
I remember watching her on THE SITE around 1997 or so, but that's it.
|
|
|
Index 
Threaded 
If you're watching the elections, where are you looking?
Reply
[Re: 
