| MASH |
|
MASH
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/26/03
|
|
Posts: 1775
|
|
Loc: Germany
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
I have successfully compiled MAMEUI under Windows XP... :)
#384214 - 11/09/19 06:54 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: I have successfully compiled MAMEUI under Windows XP... :)
[Re: MASH]
#384217 - 11/09/19 01:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: I have successfully compiled MAMEUI under Windows XP... :)
[Re: MASH]
#384218 - 11/09/19 05:09 PM
|
|
|
It’s never been said that you can’t build MAME for Windows XP any more, but it’s definitely well into “if it breaks you get to keep the pieces” territory.
|
|
|
| MASH |
|
MASH
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/26/03
|
|
Posts: 1775
|
|
Loc: Germany
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
About the saturn.cpp and sqlite3 errors: Set ARCHOPTS=-flto -march=core2
[Re: MASH]
#384230 - 11/10/19 10:14 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: About the saturn.cpp and sqlite3 errors: Set ARCHOPTS=-flto -march=core2
[Re: MASH]
#384231 - 11/10/19 11:13 AM
|
|
|
Building with LTO enabled will greatly increase the size of intermediate objects and increase build time. The resulting binary may not work properly. We don't support building with LTO enabled.
The proper way to work around the spurious warnings in the HP/NEC Saturn CPU core and sqlite3 is to use NOWERROR=1.
Pretty much all the advice you've given is bad advice.
|
|
|
| MASH |
|
MASH
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/26/03
|
|
Posts: 1775
|
|
Loc: Germany
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Doesn't work for sqlite3.c
[Re: Vas Crabb]
#384232 - 11/10/19 11:56 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Doesn't work for sqlite3.c
[Re: MASH]
#384233 - 11/10/19 12:19 PM
|
|
|
You shouldn't use -Ofast at all, as it breaks maths semantics that MAME depends on as well as breaking SQLite3. You're not being smart, you're just making a bigger binary that won't work properly.
|
|
|
| MASH |
|
MASH
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/26/03
|
|
Posts: 1775
|
|
Loc: Germany
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Solved the problem with limited memory and option -j >2
[Re: MASH]
#384242 - 11/11/19 05:56 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Solved the problem with limited memory and option -j >2
[Re: MASH]
#384244 - 11/12/19 04:10 AM
|
|
|
Turning of noexecute is a really bad idea for security, on top of running an OS that's no longer receiving regular patches. Can you please stop posting? Every single post of yours in this thread contains bad advice.
|
|
|
| MASH |
|
MASH
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/26/03
|
|
Posts: 1775
|
|
Loc: Germany
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: Solved the problem with limited memory and option -j >2
[Re: Vas Crabb]
#384245 - 11/12/19 06:57 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: I have successfully compiled MAMEUI under Windows XP... :)
[Re: Vas Crabb]
#384263 - 11/13/19 09:07 AM
|
|
|
Indeed, it's been more broken than functional for at least five years. Some builds of GCC will just fail to build anything XP can work with; I ran into this back in 2013 when running some tests on an older (at the time) machine.
I'd personally go so far as to say it hasn't been a supported environment since that time.
|
---
Try checking the MAME manual at http://docs.mamedev.org
|
|
| MASH |
|
MASH
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 09/26/03
|
|
Posts: 1775
|
|
Loc: Germany
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Update (18th Nov): Successfully build MAME with GCC 9.2 under Windows XP
[Re: MASH]
#384298 - 11/18/19 05:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Index 
Threaded 
I have successfully compiled MAMEUI under Windows XP... :)
Reply
[Re: 
