|
Unidasm
#347995 - 12/11/15 09:29 PM
|
|
|
I'm sure it will be obvious when told, but where did m6502 move to?
|
|
|
|
Any help?
[Re: 2600]
#353120 - 04/17/16 10:51 PM
|
|
|
Anyone? What am I missing? I think m6502 disappeared around .144 unless it got consumed by another architecture, but I just don't see which one it would be in.
|
|
|
|
Re: Any help?
[Re: 2600]
#353122 - 04/17/16 11:48 PM
|
|
|
Unidasm doesn't work with the 'generated' cores, so vanished when the core was rewritten, yes.
|
|
|
|
Re: Any help?
[Re: Haze]
#353127 - 04/18/16 12:52 AM
|
|
|
> Unidasm doesn't work with the 'generated' cores, so vanished when the core was > rewritten, yes.
Thanks for the response. I didn't realize the core was rewritten. I'm not familiar with what a generated core is though.
|
|
|
|
Re: Any help?
[Re: 2600]
#353146 - 04/18/16 01:17 PM
|
|
|
> > Unidasm doesn't work with the 'generated' cores, so vanished when the core was > > rewritten, yes. > > Thanks for the response. I didn't realize the core was rewritten. I'm not familiar > with what a generated core is though.
Rather than having the source code for the 6502 core itself checked into the repository, the "source" is actually a more high-level way of defining the core, which is parsed at build time in order to generate the .h and .cpp files necessary to compile the core. Currently, the M68000 and 6502 cores are like that, I believe.
|
|
|
|
Re: Any help?
[Re: MooglyGuy]
#353152 - 04/18/16 03:58 PM
|
|
|
> > > Unidasm doesn't work with the 'generated' cores, so vanished when the core was > > > rewritten, yes. > > > > Thanks for the response. I didn't realize the core was rewritten. I'm not familiar > > with what a generated core is though. > > Rather than having the source code for the 6502 core itself checked into the > repository, the "source" is actually a more high-level way of defining the core, > which is parsed at build time in order to generate the .h and .cpp files necessary to > compile the core. Currently, the M68000 and 6502 cores are like that, I believe.
Interesting, not sure how I missed that in the release notes.
Do you think adding the generated core support to unidasm will be in the works? Not sure if anyone else uses unidasm.
|
|
|
R. Belmont |
Cuckoo for IGAvania
|
|
|
Reged: 09/21/03
|
Posts: 9716
|
Loc: ECV-197 The Orville
|
|
Send PM
|
|
|
Re: Any help?
[Re: MooglyGuy]
#353380 - 04/22/16 05:18 PM
|
|
|
> > > Unidasm doesn't work with the 'generated' cores, so vanished when the core was > > > rewritten, yes. > > > > Thanks for the response. I didn't realize the core was rewritten. I'm not familiar > > with what a generated core is though. > > Rather than having the source code for the 6502 core itself checked into the > repository, the "source" is actually a more high-level way of defining the core, > which is parsed at build time in order to generate the .h and .cpp files necessary to > compile the core. Currently, the M68000 and 6502 cores are like that, I believe.
6809 and H8 are that way too.
|
|
|